This problem is one that I encountered when trekking in the Himalayas. If you are on a mountain with an unobstructed view of the horizon, then your day is extended by a few extra minutes that the Sun takes to drop below the horizon at sunset (or rise above, at sunrise). The geometry is fairly simple, but a few days ago I saw a quote attributed to the astronomer Neal de Grasse Tyson. I tried to verify it, and I did not get the same numbers.
So I checked online, and I got differing answers - which I reproduce below. As well as the simple derivation that I did. Have I got something wrong? Dunno!
So I checked online, and I got differing answers - which I reproduce below. As well as the simple derivation that I did. Have I got something wrong? Dunno!
a a) Neal de Grasse Tyson, quoted by the Indian
Express in the “Social Intelligence” column, 15th June 2016:
“Indeed from atop Burj Khalifa in Dubai they get four extra
minutes of daylight, two in the morning and two in the evening.”
The top of Burj Khalifa is at about 828 metres height.
b b) Quote from the following website: assuming a
plane flying at an altitude of 12 kms:
“At most latitudes on the
Earth, the effect of increased altitude is the same: it makes the Sun rise
earlier and set later than it would at that same location from the ground. To
make things simple, let's assume that you are in a plane over the ocean, at the
equator at sunset. In that case, straightforward trigonometry indicates that at
a typical commercial airplane altitude of 12000 metres, you can see an extra
2 degrees (emphasis added) "around" the Earth. Since the Earth
moves around the Sun at a rate of a quarter of a degree a minute, it means that
at this altitude, sunset occurs 8 minutes later than it would from the ground. The
variation with altitude is approximately linear, (emphasis added) and so we
conclude that sunset is later by 1 minute for every 1.5 kilometres in altitude,
and that sunrise is earlier by the same amount.
Now, all of this is
complicated somewhat by the fact that you don't stay in one place in a plane,
but you travel in a given direction: if this direction is predominantly East or
West, then the plane's motion will completely change the answer we got above
(in particular, travelling West at sunset can lengthen the latter significantly
in a commercial jet). So, the results above are valid in a plane if a) the
plane is moving rather slowly (like a personal plane) or b) the plane is
travelling in the North-South direction.”
c c) Derived formulas:
Mean radius of Earth is R = 6371
kms. The horizon in the above figure is at the point that is tangent to a
spherical Earth, so it makes a right angle to the radius (apologies for the
figure!).
The angle to the horizon,
from a height h above Mean Sea Level, is given by:
cos (q) = R / (R+h)
Approximating for small angles:
cos(q) = 1 – (q2/2) = 1/ [ 1 + (h/R)] = 1 – (h/R)
Thus:
q = (h/R)1/2
Let h = 12 kms, and R = 6371 kms,
so q = 0.0614 rads = 3.52 degs – instead of 2 degs
according to the Cornell blog.
Burj Khalifa is at h = 0.828 kms,
so q = 0.0161 rads = 0.924 degs.
Multiplying by 4 mins/deg,as
mentioned above, (180° = 12 hours) we get 3.69 mins for Burj instead of 2 mins,
and 14 mins for the plane at cruising altitude.
Also, the angle varies as the
square root of the altitude – not directly proportional as the Cornell blog
b) stated.
cd) However, the following blog gives values for Burj
Khalifa (828 m) and Mt.Everest (8,848 m):
These
calculations are in better (but not perfect) agreement with the calculations in
c):
“With a height of 828 m (2,717 ft), visible sunrise to
someone standing on top of the crown of Burj (something unrealistic) on June
22nd would be at 5:24:56 AM versus 5:29:31 AM on sea level, a difference of 4
minutes and 35 seconds.
With an elevation of 8,848 Meters (29, 029 feet), sunrise on
Mt.Everest would be up to 15 minutes and 31 seconds earlier on Mount Everest
than on sea level. The range of the effect is from 15 minutes and 31 seconds on
June 22nd, to a “low” of 13 minutes 41 seconds earlier on March 18th.”
This website implies that it is a
java-based app based on calculations made by Rabbi Harfenes – that are more
detailed because they take both the date as well as the latitude and longitude
into account.
The formulas given earlier for
Mt.Everest yields: q = 3.02°, which means 12.1 mins. That is:
kosherjava gives an answer for Mt.Everest that is 13% higher or 28% higher (depending
on the date) than the answer from the formulas above.
So: what gives? How much would
the latitude and longitude matter if the Earth is pretty much spherical (about
40 kms more radius at the equator than at the Poles) ?
de) Also see the following site, which gives a low
value for Mt.Everest and also again states that the variation is linear with altitude:
ef) TimeAndDate.com also includes a handy calculator for the times of sunrise and sunset on any date
for any location on the planet. As with their Day and Night Map, that
calculator assumes a flat and unobstructed horizon. They also assume the
observer is at the same elevation (measured from sea level) as the horizon. If
you were observing from the top of a tall mountain, sunrise would happen
slightly earlier, and sunset slightly later. But it would be a small correction
— only about 6 minutes if observing from
the top of Mt. Everest. The correction factor is: ΔT = ±1 minute per 1.5 km
elevation. Again, assumed linear!
Summary: Extra time:
|
Burj
Dubai
828 m
|
Mt.Everest
8,848 m
|
Plane at
12 kms
12,000 m
|
|
|||
Tyson
|
2 mins
|
|
|
Cornell*
|
33 secs
|
5 mins
54 secs
|
8 mins
|
Kosherjava
|
4 mins
35 secs
|
13 mins
41 secs to 15 mins 31 secs
|
|
TimeAndDate.com
|
|
~ 6 mins
|
|
Calculations
|
3 mins
41 sec
|
12 mins
6 secs
|
14 mins
5 secs
|
*Cornell
calculations mentioned only the plane; the other two I have calculated assuming
that the 1 min per 1.5 km rule is correct – which I seriously doubt!
No comments:
Post a Comment